Friendly reminder that bad social justice is a vicious cancer on basic humanity.
Friendly reminder that bad social justice is a vicious cancer on basic humanity.
Because everything of importance has radicals, and it’s annoying especially with such a cause as feminism but we need to get past this and fight for our equality, which is all we want.
Because she’s invalidating the feelings of rape victims both in first world a countries and third world countries. Feminists ARE fighting for third world country feminism too.
Because she’s obviously led a more privileged life in which she’s experienced little misogyny towards her and little sexism.
Because sure, feminists don’t speak for ALL women, and there are radical feminists like there are radicals in anything like I said before (see: Christianity, Atheism, Government/Politics), but we do speak up for those who are afraid to, primarily rape victims of both genders, in our own countries and others (see: India).
Because 1 in 4 women will be raped in this lifetime but by teaching girls to be cautious of men and to learn basic self defence skills, we’re “teaching them to be afraid of men and lumping all men in the same category.” (Which sounds an awful lot like “Not all men” to me… Which isn’t the problem. I know it’s not all men. Feminists all know that it’s not all men. But it’s enough men to warrant a change)
Because tragedies happen everyday and we aren’t “using them to further our agendas.”
Because feminism is feminism. There is no “1st world modern feminists” because they are clearly uneducated like other people are about feminism.
Because feminism never taught me to be afraid of men.
It taught me to cautious and that rape was never my fault, in a way that society did not.
holy shit you actually believe in the 1 in 4 false statistic. the one that’s been debunked by feminists and non-feminists. i bet you actually believe the false 1 in 79 statistic for men, too.
feminists hide the fact that 40% of rapists are women and that 50% of rape victims are men. why? is it to keep women as perpetual percieved victims and men as perpetual perceived aggressors?
i know plenty (PLENTY) of rape victims who are against feminism, while feminists speak over them and dismiss their opinions.
You can be the least privileged person (by their standards of course) and still be erased and called a bigot/stupid/derailing/privileged/a faker or whatever other bullshit because you don’t agree with them.
"Poor brown queer trans woman :("
"Oh wait she’s antifeminist? "
"Fuck you, feminism is good for everyone!!! It helps brown queer trans women who have no privilege. Shut up you’re just privileged/internalized racist/internalized misogynist/you dont know what feminism is"
Yeah, they give you incorrect measurements so you’ll buy the bras they do have. You’ll most likely be given a band size too big and a cup size too small, which results in lots of problems.
This was in the notes for the Victoria’s Secret post.
I feel the need to explain something about bra sizes here: A band size too big with a cup size too small wouldn’t cause any problems at all. It would fit you. It would be the correct size for you.
If you’re a 34D, but can’t find a bra in that size for some reason, you can instead buy a 36C and it will fit you just as well as a 34D. It’s called “sister sizes.” The rule is that if you go down a cup size then you go up a band size.
The inverse is also true. If you go up a cup size then you go down a band size. So if you’re a 36C, you can fit perfectly into a 34D.
If you measure in at a cup size that’s larger than what they sell, VS will simply follow the sister sizes rule and get you something a cup smaller and a band larger.
Fucking ignorant ass people need to learn their shit.
Because they generally don’t measure or calculate accurately, and because if you have either a larger band size or a larger cup size, they won’t have anything to fit you, but are likely to try to sell you something that DOESN’T fit, or to shame you for not fitting into their merchandize (most of which is SMALLER than the average USian woman).
Actually, the average breast size is I believe a B cup? And Victoria’s Secret goes up to D cups. Learn some statistics MG.
It’s complicated, because yes, the “average” size is a B…but that’s not accurate, because almost all women wear the wrong size. And major retailers like Vicky’s perpetuate that, because women’s REAL sizes cover a much wider range than bra manufacturers would have you believe. It’s more profitable for most women to believe themselves to belong to the already-established range.
For example, I grew up wearing 34Bs. They fit SO bad. They didn’t support me at all, the band rode around and didn’t touch my chest at the sternum, and I had cuts in my shoulders from the straps. Why did I wear them, then? Because sizing guides told me that was my size! I thought that’s just what bras were like.
I was in my twenties before I understood that I’m actually a 30D. A good 30D bra fits me like a dream, and feels like wearing nothing at all.
If I went to a retailer like Victoria’s Secret? I can virtually GUARANTEE I’d be sized wrong. My sister also wears a 30D (sized by a specialty boutique), but she and my mom first tried to get her sized at a Victoria’s Secret. They told her she was a 34A.
But MG’s still wrong, because there’s simply no way most women are sized out of Victoria’s Secret by sheer size (and not other fit problems). My mom is quite fat, and she still doesn’t top out their clothing range. Their biggest sizes fall off of her, and she’s easily in the fattest 25% of people I know.
I’ve worked at Victoria’s Secret, and I can attest to the fact that they take bra fittings extremely seriously. It’s the first thing you get trained on, even if you’re not working the sales floor. I worked in the stock room processing new shipments, and I still had to be trained on how to do fittings. Everyone there knows how to do it. They do make mistakes, but they are not incompetent. In fact, one of the biggest reasons for them messing up on sizes is someone wearing an extremely incorrect bra size in the first place. If the size is only off by a little, they can get the right size. But if it’s horribly off, like a D wearing anything below a C, that’s going to mess them up.
And they would not intentionally sell you something that doesn’t fit unless you insisted on buying that size. In fact, at the one I worked at, it was policy to direct customers to stores that stocked larger sizes if they didn’t fit anything we had. VS does actually care about the well-being of their customers. Quite a lot in fact.
Yes, there are occasionally employees, and sometimes even whole locations, that simply don’t give a shit. But that is by no means the norm. That would actually be considered rather unusual.
this website is an experience
Sometimes even tears aren’t enough
Do people actually believe this? Like, is this actually a troll or someone legitamtely believing this. I don’t f****** know anymore.
People actually believe that shit. People have fucking died because people believe that shit.
The lie is over now.
The truth is out.
Its time to wake up and accept the fact that the people on the top, don’t have your best interest in mind. All they ever wanted, want and will want is money over your and your children’s dead body. Its Eugenics. Nothing new.
Wake up and Care and Share before too late.
you people are the reason why measles are back in new york
If measile is back, then it should only affect those who aren’t vaccinated. But is affecting those who are. THINK.
Vaccination doesn’t work, and even if it did… it only protects for couple years max.
Don’t seek vaccination … but nutrition my friend. Nutrition is the true medicine.
vaccines are bullshit and cause adverse reactions like death
where is your proof
hOLY FRICK YOU DONE PISSED ME OFF AND I DON’T GET MAD EASILY SO CONGRATS
SIT YOUR IGNORANT FEARMONGERING SELF DOWN AND LISTEN UP BECAUSE THIS IS GONNA BE LONG
THE HUMAN IMMUNE SYSTEM IS MADE OF TWO PARTS: THE INNATE SYSTEM AND THE ADAPTIVE SYSTEM. YOU NEED BOTH WORKING TOGETHER TO PROTECT YOU FROM DISEASES, BUT THE ADAPTIVE SYSTEM IS DESIGNED TO ONLY PROTECT YOU FROM THINGS IT’S ALREADY EXPERIENCED. IT CAN TAKE UP TO TWO WEEKS TO KICK IN AGAINST AN INFECTION IT’S NEVER SEEN BEFORE, AND GUESS WHAT FARTNUGGET YOU CAN BE DEAD OR SCREWED OVER FOR LIFE IN TWO WEEKS. BUT WHEN IT SEES A DISEASE IT CREATES MEMORY CELLS THAT REMEMBER THAT DISEASE AND CAN KICK IN IMMEDIATELY WHEN IT HAPPENS AGAIN, USUALLY QUICK ENOUGH TO PREVENT YOU FROM GETTING SICK AT ALL.
THE POINT OF VACCINES IS TO USE A NATURAL BODY RESPONSE TO PROTECT PEOPLE BY HELPING IT DO WHAT IT DOES ALREADY. YOU USE ATTENUATED NONVIRULENT FORMS OF THE DISEASE TO PREP THE IMMUNE SYSTEM SO IT WILL REMEMBER HOW TO RECOGNIZE AND FIGHT THAT DISEASE IN THE FUTURE. THAT IS HOW YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM WORKS SO DON’T YOU DARE START CLAIMING THAT YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM MEANS YOU DON’T NEED VACCINATIONS. THAT’S THE ENTIRE POINT. YOUR IMMUNE SYSTEM CAN’T DO IT ALONE. THAT’S WHY SMALLPOX KILLED 500 MILLION PEOPLE BEFORE VACCINATIONS STOPPED IT.
VACCINES DO NOT CAUSE AUTISM HOLY FRICK THERE HAS NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE BEEN PROOF OF THAT AND I CHALLENGE YOU TO SHOW ME SOME. THERE WAS ONE DOCTOR WHO PUBLISHED A STUDY IN 1998 SHOWING VACCINES MIGHT CAUSE AUTISM. IT WAS FAKE AND PROVED WRONG OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT HE USED UNETHICAL AND INVASIVE PROCEDURES ON CHILDREN AND HE WAS BANNED FROM PRACTICING MEDICINE.
THE DIAGNOSIS OF AUTISM HAS IMPROVED SINCE 1970. CORRELATION DOES NOT IMPLY CAUSATION. YOU KNOW WHAT ELSE HAS INCREASED SINCE 1970? INTERNET USAGE. MAYBE THE INTERNET CAUSES AUTISM, IF YOU’RE GONNA USE THAT LOGIC.
AND HOLY FRICKING HECK EVEN IF YOU REALLY BELIEVE THE LIE THAT VACCINES ARE LINKED TO AUTISM, ARE YOU REALLY THAT SCARED OF AUTISM THAT YOU’D RATHER YOUR CHILD DIE HORRIBLY OF A COMPLETELY PREVENTABLE DISEASE THAN BE AUTISTIC
THIOMERSAL IS AN ORGANIC MERCURY-CONTAINING COMPOUND THAT WAS USED AS A PRESERVATIVE IN VACCINES IN CONTROLLED AMOUNTS BECAUSE GUESS WHAT DOUCHECANOE EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD IS CHEMICALS AND THESE GUYS ARE PAID TO KNOW HOW TO COMBINE THEM PROPERLY. IT WAS NEVER SHOWN TO CAUSE AUTISM AND THE SIGNS OF MERCURY POISONING ARE WELL-KNOWN AND NOTHING LIKE WHAT PEOPLE ARE CLAIMING VACCINES DO. EVEN SO, IT WAS PHASED OUT OF VACCINES IN 2001. THE ONLY ONE THAT EVER STILL USES IT IS THE INFLUENZA VACCINE AND GUESS WHAT? AFTER A CRAPTON OF TESTS DONE BY PEOPLE SMARTER THAN YOU WHO ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT THEY’RE DOING AND HOW CHEMISTRY AND MEDICINE WORK, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE ONLY SIDE EFFECT WAS- WAIT FOR IT- SLIGHT REDNESS AT THE INJECTION SITE.BECAUSE AGAIN, THIOMERSAL IS NOT PURE MERCURY YOU ABSOLUTE TURDSTAIN AND IS NOT THE LEAST BIT COMPARABLE TO TOXIC WASTE. AND DO YOU EVEN KNOW HOW MUCH 25 MICROGRAMS IS? THAT’S 0.000025 GRAMS. GRAMS. THAT IS AN ABSURDLY SMALL AMOUNT. I CAN’T EVEN CONVEY HOW SMALL THAT IS. PROBABLY THE SIZE OF YOUR BRAIN.
IM NOT TOUCHING THE BILL GATES THING BECAUSE I DONT KNOW ENOUGH ABOUT IT. SOMEONE ELSE CAN DO THAT FOR ME. OR YANNO YOU COULD GOOGLE IT AND ACTUALLY EDUCATE YOURSELF FROM OBJECTIVE SOURCES AND NOT SOURCELESS FEARMONGERING JPEGS REPOSTED SO MANY TIMES THEY’RE ALMOST COMPLETELY ILLEGIBLE.
HEEYYYYYY GUESS WHAT ALL THE FOOD IN THE WORLD WON’T HELP YOU IF YOU’RE THROWING IT UP OR CRAPPING IT OUT OR IF SOMETHING COMPLETELY UNRELATED TO FOOD IS KILLING YOU FROM THE INSIDE OUT. YEAH MAN PEOPLE NEED FOOD AND WE SHOULD HELP MORE WITH THAT BUT YOU ALSO GOTTA PRIORITIZE THINGS THAT KILL SO MUCH MORE EFFECTIVELY THAN STARVATION.
YOU SHOULD BE HAPPY THAT WE’VE GOT ALL THESE VACCINES NOW. PEOPLE WHO LIVED IN THE 1700’S WOULD BE CRYING TEARS OF JOY IF THEY HEARD THAT WE HAD WIPED OUT SMALLPOX AND POLIO AND WE COULD PREVENT ALL THESE OTHER DISEASES. LOOK AT THAT LIST. THAT’S NOT A LIST OF POISONS. THAT’S A LIST OF THE DISEASES WHOSE BUTTS WE’VE KICKED AND THAT DESERVES THE BIGGEST HELL YEAH IN THE HISTORY OF MEDICINE.
EXCEPT NOW MORONS LIKE YOU ARE BRINGING THEM BACK. YOUR BIT OF NON-LOGIC THERE JUST PROVES HOW LITTLE YOU UNDERSTAND THIS. THERE’S A THING CALLED HERD IMMUNITY AND IT’S JUST AS IMPORTANT, IF NOT MORESO, THAN INDIVIDUAL IMMUNITY. SOME PEOPLE CAN’T GET VACCINES DUE TO HEALTH ISSUES. WE’RE PROTECTING THEM TOO WHEN EVERYONE ELSE DOES BECAUSE IT CAN’T SPREAD. BUT LET’S TALK ABOUT HEALTHY PEOPLE, SINCE THAT’S WHAT YOU’RE ASKING ABOUT. DO YOU KNOW HOW FAST DISEASES MUTATE? WITHIN LESS THAN FIVE YEARS FOR SOME. AND IT’S CAUSED BY A THING CALLED SELECTIVE PRESSURE. SELECTIVE PRESSURE IS WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU GET A TWO WEEK DOSE OF ANTIBIOTICS AND ONLY TAKE TEN DAYS’ WORTH BECAUSE YOU FEEL BETTER AND YOU KNOW BETTER THAN THOSE SILLY DOCTORS. WELL GUESS WHAT? YOU DIDN’T KILL ALL THE BACTERIA AND NOW THEY’RE FREE TO GROW AGAIN. AND SINCE THEY’RE THE ONES THAT SURVIVED, THEY’RE NOW IMMUNE TO THE ANTIBIOTICS AND FREE TO SPREAD THAT TO OTHERS. CONGRATS BUTTMUNCH YOU JUST RUINED IT FOR EVERYONE BECAUSE NOW IT’S MUTATED AND SPREADING AGAIN AND THE ANTIBIOTICS DON’T WORK. THE SAME THING HAPPENS WITH VACCINES. IF PEOPLE LIKE YOU KEEP AVOIDING VACCINES, IT GIVES DISEASES LIKE MEASLES A TOEHOLD IN THE POPULATION TO MUTATE AND SPREAD AND CAUSE ANOTHER EPIDEMIC
VACCINES DON’T WEAR OFF AFTER FIVE YEARS I DON’T KNOW WHERE YOU’RE GETTING THAT INFORMATION BUT HOLY JEEZ IT’S JUST PLAIN WRONG. THE CLOSEST THING I FOUND ON GOOGLE WAS SOME CONTROVERSY ABOUT THE HPV VACCINE LASTING 6-9 YEARS AND EVEN THAT WAS UNDER SCRUTINY AND NOT EVERY DISEASE WORKS THE SAME WAY. SOME ARE FOREVER, SOME REQUIRE BOOSTERS, ETC ETC. I COULD GET INTO WHY BUT THIS HAS GOTTEN LONG ENOUGH SO LET’S BRING IT BACK TO PEOPLE SMARTER THAN YOU HAVE STUDIED THIS AND BUILT ON CENTURIES OF MEDICAL PROCESS AND THIS IS WHAT THEY DO FOR A LIVING SO I THINK THEY MIGHT KNOW A BIT MORE ABOUT IT THAN YOU
P.S. NUTRITION? NUTRITION? I’LL JUST EAT THIS APPLE AND IT’LL FIGHT ALL THESE BACTERIA AND VIRUSES. OR MAYBE POTATO CHIPS CAUSE MEASLES. STOP AND LISTEN TO YOURSELF HOLY CRAP.
*furious loud clapping*
I FUCKING LAUGH AT PEOPLE WHO SERIOUSLY BELIEVE THAT VACCINES ARE THE CAUSE OF AUTISM LIKE FUCKING WOW OH NO THE NUMBERS MAY HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH THE POPULATION FUCKING GROWING RAPIDLY?! HAS ANYONE ACTUALLY PUT THOUGHT INTO THAT HUH?! IM NOT THAT FUCKING BRIGHT BUT HOLY FUCKING SHIT I THOUGHT THAT MAY HAVE BEEN A LITTLE OBVIOUS.
BASICALLY FUCK EVERYONE WHO THINKS VACCINES CAUSE IT AND GET FUCKING IMMUNIZED LIKE HOLY FUCK IT SHOULD BE COMMON FUCKING SENSE
That was a goddamn beautiful tirade
But Monsanto is evil.
That tirade was a work of art.
The charge that feminism stereotypes men as predators while reducing women to helpless victims certainly doesn’t apply to all feminists—but it’s a reasonably fair description of a large, influential, highly visible segment of modern feminism.
The latest skirmish on the gender battlefield is “Women Against Feminism”: women and girls taking to the social media to declare that they don’t need or want feminism, usually via photos of themselves with handwritten placards. The feminist reaction has ranged from mockery to dismay to somewhat patronizing (or should that be “matronizing”?) lectures on why these dissidents are wrong. But, while the anti-feminist rebellion has its eye-rolling moments, it raises valid questions about the state of Western feminism in the 21st Century — questions that must be addressed if we are to continue making progress toward real gender equality.
Female anti-feminism is nothing new. In the 19th century, plenty of women were hostile to the women’s movement and to women who pursued nontraditional paths. In the 1970s, Marabel Morgan’s regressive manifesto The Total Woman was a top best-seller, and Phyllis Schlafly led opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment. But such anti-feminism was invariably about defending women’s traditional roles. Some of today’s “women against feminism” fit that mold: They feel that feminism demeans stay-at-home mothers, or that being a “true woman” means loving to cook and clean for your man. Many others, however, say they repudiate feminism even though — indeed, because — they support equality and female empowerment:
“I don’t need feminism because I believe in equality, not entitlements and supremacy.”
“I don’t need feminism because it reinforces the men as agents/women as victims dichotomy.”
“I do not need modern feminism because it has become confused with misandry which is as bad as misogyny, and whatever I want to do or be in life, I will become through my own hard work.”
Again and again, the dissenters say that feminism belittles and demonizes men, treating them as presumptive rapists while encouraging women to see themselves as victims. “I am not a victim” and “I can take responsibility for my actions” are recurring themes. Many also challenge the notion that American women in the 21stcentury are “oppressed,” defiantly asserting that “the patriarchy doesn’t exist” and “there is no rape culture.”
One common response from feminists is to say that Women Against Feminism “don’t understand what feminism is” and to invoke its dictionary definition: “the theory of the political, economic, and social equality of the sexes.” The new anti-feminists have a rejoinderfor that, too: They’re judging modern feminism by its actions, not by the book. And here, they have a point.
Finally an article that actually takes the points of anti-feminism on board. Finally an article that doesn’t just tell us we ‘don’t understand what feminism is’.
Dear: Social Justice Warriors,
If you do not understand the fucking difference between a Hijab and a Bindi, do not even try to act like a godly educated asshole who will save us “minorities” from culture-appropriation, because you’ll just end up embarrassing yourselves.
I need like an eternity of a moment.
• Withdrawal of Israeli tanks from the Gaza border.
• Freeing all the prisoners that were arrested after the killing of the three youths.
• Lifting the siege and opening the border crossings to commerce and people.
• Establishing an international seaport and airport which would be under U.N. supervision.
• Increasing the permitted fishing zone to 10 kilometers.
• Internationalizing the Rafah Crossing and placing it under the supervision of the U.N. and some Arab nations.
• International forces on the borders.
• Easing conditions for permits to pray at the Al Aqsa Mosque.
• Prohibition on Israeli interference in the reconciliation agreement.
• Re-establishing an industrial zone and improvements in further economic development in the Gaza Strip.
It’s funny how truces put forward by Hamas are declined and largely ignored by MSM but the moment Hamas reject any farcical truces agreed to by Israel (which keep the inhumane blockade on Gaza intact, for example) it’s front page news and you’ll never hear the end of it. ‘HAMAS REJECTED THE TRUCE HAMAS DOESN’T WANT PEACE’.
And even then, Hamas’s truce demands aren’t even that major. Like, there’s not even a demand for a return to a respectable border. Where’s the “Hamas willing to put aside border dispute for the sake of peace” headline?Those are incredibly reasonable terms (more than reasonable, I’d say, they’re well within their rights to ask for so much more). Israel claims that everything it does is to protect its civilians but the fact that they’re not willing to guarantee those civilians’ safety by agreeing to things like relaxing prayer restrictions and allowing increased fishing says a lot about what its actual priorities are.
What Really Happened in the Congo: Belgium’s ‘Heart of Darkness’
Leopold famously said when he was forced to hand over the Congo Free State to the Belgian nation: “I will give them my Congo but they have no right to know what I have done there,” and proceeded to burn archives.
Did y’all know about this?
Tuesday (July 22), Bey posted a photo to Instagram in which she’s all kitted out like Rosie The Riveter, flexing under the words “We Can Do It.” She didn’t provide any context for the snap, but we’re pretty much assuming that she posted it to basically save the world from itself. Also because she looks damn good in loose denim.
Queen Bey isn’t new to feminism — she’s basically been dubbed an honorary Riot Grrrl by Bikini Kill’s Kathleen Hanna and she contributed an essay to Maria Shriver’s “The Shriver Report: A Woman’s Nation Pushes Back from the Brink.” Oh, and she’s been repping the “f” word on tour with Jay Z, too, incorporating the term into her stage show in massive black and white letters.
Now tell us again why you don’t need feminism, ladies. The Beygency is listening…
Well shit - Beyonce got her photo taken?
Great rebuttal Beyonce!
There go all my well thought through reasons for being anti-feminist.
I love how this article just seems to assume that because Beyonce did something all the anti-feminist women and girls in the world who have dedicated time and energy to researching and understanding feminism and formulating their own ideas as to why they are against it are just going to crumble into tears at the sight of Beyonce posing as an overused war propaganda poster model and come running back into the arms of Mother Feminism and Godmother Bey.
The thing I take from this massively obnoxious article is that the author assumes that women are basically: 1) a hive mind who all apparently love the same (overrated) American pop singer and 2) weak-minded beings who will crumble into submission and conformity at even the slightest suggestion of disapproval from an authority figure. Like, are feminist writers trying to sabotage themselves at this point?
The hijab is not the most important part of being a Muslim woman, but it is certainly the most visible. In a time when Islamophobia only seems to be on the rise in the West, a practice that is so personal and diverse has become a warped and misunderstood part of a flat and monolithic picture of Muslim women.
THIS. 100 times, this.
Dude, this is so well said.
A perfect description.
So, you want to sexualize and degrade men? What would that accomplish?
-The Trans One
I just can’t get enough of this post of some woman being so bitter and hurt that Hooters exists that she dreams up this fantasy of revenge that like 99% of men would honestly not give a fuck about if it were a reality.
Male followers, would you give a fuck if a Cahones existed?
Not in the least, I just think its hilarious that these cunts are so fucking bitter and conceited that they believe everyone is as outraged as them.
Yo Hooters is the shit, their food is good as hell. I wanted to work there and I might after I move out. How the hell do they get mad about people covering up to breastfeed and not sexualizing breast, but WHOOA OAOAH take your kids to Hooters and its a nightmare.
No one is fucking forced to work at Hooters. They know what they’re getting into…
Also, waitresses at Hooters tend to make more in tips than waitresses almost anywhere else. They make fucking bank. I wish the Hooters near me was hiring. I would work there in a second.
What people say: “An offensive character in a work does not mean the creator actually endorses said views.”
What folks like Lin-lin apparently hear: “You have literally no right to be offended, because the character is fictional.”
I also like Petey’s post, which looks vaguely sensible at first blush, until you realize he’s implying that characters are necessarily a reflection of their creator, therefore any offensive things characters say are likely to be the creator’s view too. I’m sure George R.R. Martin would be quite surprised to learn he’s a eunuch, little person, and Khaleesi.
I never did like Nostalgia Chick.
I didn’t know she’d fucking turned on Doug, though. Like, for real? He’s the one who fucking hired her, and she turns around and spews this bullshit?
The Nostalgia Critic is not meant to be a loveable character. He’s kind of a raging asshole. Yes, you’re supposed to find some of the things he says offensive. That’s the character. It is the character who has offensive views and says hurtful things, not Doug.
In fact, isn’t Doug a feminist, himself?
What the fuck is Lindsey on?
She is attacking someone who is the fucking reason she’s even known by people. First she stans for Sarkeesian, now this.
oooh my god she supported Sarkeesian?
Yo, I just read her interview on themarysue and she talks about how free speech shouldn’t exist and how she will delete any comments she deems “stupid” meaning any discussion and critique will be non existent. No wonder her and Sarkeesian are friends.
Fun fact, after watching her videos, I went from being mildly ok with feminism to hating it.
Who is Lindsay ellis?
Nostalgia Chick: The “female” version of Nostalgia Critic.
What a stab in the back. Doug helped her be famous, now she talks crap about him. No wonder she’s not in any of his new reviews anymore. This is what arrogance gets you….
I know someone who isn’t getting invited to the next TGWTG anniversary video…
"Doug a feminist"
Fuckin…..no….please…..someone tell me it’s not as bad as I think
There are lots of feminists who aren’t SJWs, like Lauren Faust. Ironically, Anita Sarkeesian likes MLP, but hates the episode of PPG Lauren wrote to criticize people who are feminists out of misandry.
Could someone send me a link or something to what’s going on? I keep hearing about it, but other than that one tweet in the picture, I can’t find anything about it.